Dallas vs. Boston:
It turns out that if you lean over and look at the side on this computer, there are various outlets and drives, and one of them accommodates a mouse. So I had the use of a mouse this week and was able to go all Raphael.
ABSMA
O_ _ _O
NOGAY
_OO_O
NOYELL
_OOO_ _
NOTEDS
OO_ _O_
THE MIGHTY _ _ _ _/_ _ _ _/ _ _ _ DEEP
(Dallas, 2.5-1.5)
Queens vs. New York:
There hasn't been a more dependable Stonewall since the 18th North Carolina emptied their rifles on the Old Mountain Road in Chancellorsville. New York, 2.5-1.5. Yeeeeee-haw!
Baltimore vs. Philadelphia:
If David Zwerling of Portland, Oregon, followed the USCL, he wouldn't have had to write "Parade" magazine to ask "are there any women chess masters?" But though he would then have saved himself a stamp, "Walter Scott" might not have felt he was really earning his $300,000 a year, so maybe it's for the best after all.
As for this match, I don't like to talk about teams that are "due", so I won't. But come on, Philly can't really lose again*. 2.5-1.5, Inventors.
Tennessee vs. Chicago:
Break up the Tempo. Or change it, if that works better. Either way they are making a mockery of the competitive balance this league was supposedly built on. Meanwhile, my job is easier, so there's some silver lining. Tennessee, 2.5-1.5
Miami vs. San Francisco:
I see the Mechanics putting their grip on the match and dealing the Sharks their first losing session. Frisco (yes I'm not a native. I think it sounds cool), 2.5-1.5.
Arizona vs. Seattle:
Assuming Hikaru is over the most famous cold since Napoleon's at Borodino, Seattle looks a comfortable favorite. Scorpions get slugged, 2.5-1.5.
*. can they?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
SPOILERS BELOW
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
arson
agony
lonely
stoned
can't figure out the puzzle! i assume "yang" is one of the words and i thought "too" should precede "deep" but that leaves me with OESE
SPOILERS BELOW
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
--------------
ahh the first one should be sonar?
so "yang sees too deep"?
Yeah, it's a pun on "Yangtze". So are you saying I should leave this one out of the "best of" collection?
Oh, two valid answers to the first word, oops. I must have forgot to check.
Ok, I changed the first word. Now it's ready for the Immaculate Collection.
Post a Comment